Period is the so-called "drip fraud". To this end, the workers' statute itself has provided for a protective system against workers: that dismissals prior to those 90 days backwards and for successive periods of 90 days backwards be computed, provided that a double condition is met. That in this new period of 90 days and, where applicable, the appropriate ones, there has been some objective individual dismissal and that it is due to the same cause. Let's take an example: “a company with 98 workers intends to fire seven of them in june 2018 through seven individual objective dismissals.
As we can see, the limit set in the workers' statute for this company to have to resort to collective dismissal is more than 9. In principle, the company would be acting whatsapp number list correctly. But, it would not be so if in the 90 days prior to those dismissals examined, a worker was dismissed for objective reasons (for example, april 2018). So we would already have seven and if in another new 90 days before he fired two for objective reasons (for example, february 2018). We would already be in the 10 workers.
Therefore, the company should resort to collective dismissal given the risk that the seven dismissals that it intends to carry out in june 2018 will be declared null and void” the calculation of workers: the company's staff for the purposes of calculating the number of workers in a company, all the workers who make up the workforce on the date on which the collective dismissal begins or the dismissals are notified will be taken into account. Whether they are permanent or temporary workers (in the case of temporary workers, provided that terminations for business reasons are adopted before the end of their