As far as the core of the judgment is concerned, it seems that it can only be said that the judge's judgment on the constitutional system can only be respected; but as far as the reasons for the judgment and the judgment process are concerned, the author must say that this is a judgment based on deceit. Whether the police and police officers can be dealt with decisively is not the problem of this case, but the abuse of power by the police and fire departments. During the oral debate, the Ministry of the Interior repeatedly reiterated that the "rule of dismissal after accumulating two major faults" is very important, because the work of police and police officers is closely related to the people and must be "resolutely dealt with".
The author wants to make it clear that the Ministry of the Interior's "absolute disposal" is nothing but a deceitful act of mutual deception. From the criminal investigation banner design practice, we can know that many wrongful cases are related to "rushing for a while". In practice, various so-called "immediate disposal" of police personnel are formed in a hurry without detailed discussion of legal judgments and facts, just like the aviation police last year. The remarks of the police officers and police officers had to be recorded at the beginning, then changed to two major demerits and dismissed, and later they were questioned as being too unreasonable and said that they would not be dismissed. Do you know what you are doing.
On the day before the court session, at the press conference, this Council also clearly pointed out that there are "nothings and fours" in the legal procedures and practices of the punishment of police and police officers: unclear provisions, disciplinary documents without information, no During the period of full preparation, there is no exercise of the right of defense, and there is no information that can be accessed. Whether the issue of police and firefighters should be dealt with decisively may be discussed, but the police and firefighters have various uncontrollable and undisciplined abuses and reckless behaviors in personnel procedures and practices, but the Ministry of the Interior refused to speak about them during the trial.